Michael Porter and Clayton Christensen Are Both Wrong About Finding the Future of Business Education

Jun 12 2014, 12:08pm CDT | by

This article is by Marty Neumeier, director of transformation at Liquid Agency, and author of Metaskills: Five Talents for the Robotic Age and The 46 Rules of Genius; An Innovator’s Guide to Creativity.

The New York Times recently pitted strategy gurus Michael Porter and Clayton Christian against each other on a thorny question: How should Harvard Business School handle both the threat and the opportunity of online disruption? Or, put another way, what’s to keep new distance-learning outfits such as Coursera and edX from repositioning Harvard as an overpriced dinosaur? In the article, “B-School, Disrupted,” business writer Jerry Useem uses the two strategists to highlight opposing views.

In one corner is Michael Porter, the Harvard professor who wrote the canonical works Competitive Strategy and Competitive Advantage. In the other corner is Clay Christensen, also a Harvard professor, author of The Innovator’s Dilemma and the Innovator’s Solution. Porter argues for evolution, not revolution, believing that the school should modernize around the edges while preserving the core. Christensen maintains that revolution is inevitable, arguing that the school should disrupt itself before its competitors do. Neither of these positions is surprising, given the theories on which both men have spent their time.

Harvard seems to have chosen a Porter-like strategy. It’s now building a program called HBX, conceived as a $1,500 “pre-MBA” online course to prepare students to speak “the language of business.” The beauty of this approach, say its proponents, is that it makes money without cannibalizing key profit centers, such as the MBA and executive education programs, which have brought in a quarter of a billion dollars per year.

HBX makes total sense on the surface: Replicate the case-study method—Harvard Business School’s secret sauce—using technology that can reach large numbers of students with fewer professors. Not only will the school make a profit with HBX, it can turn around and make another profit by feeding selected graduates into its $100,000 MBA program. On the apparent strength of this strategy, the school has made an investment in a sophisticated studio setup that mimics the tiered-style Harvard classroom.

According to the article, the HBX facility will place a computer screen with a student’s image invoice, instead of the live student, in each of its 60 “seats.” A professor will then stand in the “pit” and orchestrate case-study discussions as if the students were physically together in the room. The past is thus preserved, and the future fended off.

What could go possibly wrong?

A lot, according to Christensen: “I think we’ve overshot the needs of the customer.” He believes it would be better to start cheap and simple—just get it out there and improve it on the fly. He also believes that any new online program needs a bit of separation from the mainstream Harvard experience, so its hands aren’t tied by old norms and the need to make immediate profits. Eventually, if the Christensen approach works, the new model would supplant the traditional brick-and-mortar model. This was the road not taken by Kodak, he says, when it continued to invest in film instead of building its future on digital.

My own view as an innovator is that neither approach will produce a lasting competitive advantage. Ironically, the reason for this can be traced to the very teaching model on which the school was founded: the case-study method.

Case-study education gets many things right. For example, it encourages students to look to the past for patterns that could shed light on a current situation. It asks future leaders to support their strategic and tactical decisions with factual evidence, not intuition alone. And it creates a rich basis for discussion, so that students and their professors can learn from one another in a fluid, interactive way.

But case-study education gets one thing wrong. It gives learners the impression that the answer to a current problem can be found in the past. Certainly the past can inform many new situations. But if the goal is to innovate, as Harvard needs to do, the past can also be mute, or even misleading. It puts one-size-fits-all boundaries on a problem, thereby limiting originality. It’s a bit like shopping for clothes on the ready-to-wear rack when what you really need is a custom-designed suit. Relying on precedent can lead to best-practice thinking instead new-practice thinking.

Given the need to innovate, Christensen’s advice—get new ideas out there cheaply and let them find their way—seems more practical than Porter’s top-down approach, in which a key concern of the new program is to reinforce the existing strategy. But to me, a brand designer, both approaches seem incomplete.

The Porter solution appears to be an educated guess based on a faulty brief. The brief, formulated by the dean as guiding principles, included these three items:

1) HBX should be economically self-sustaining (it should function as a profit center).

2) It should not substitute for the MBA program (don’t cannibalize existing revenue streams).

3) It should replicate the school’s discussion-based learning model (reinforce Harvard’s historical differentiator).

Any design thinker would immediately see the error: The brief jumps to conclusions. It’s based on untested assumptions, unquestioned beliefs, and creaky mental models./>/>

Who says the program has to be self-sustaining? Why shouldn’t it substitute for the current (and possibly endangered) MBA program? Does it really have to replicate the case-study model? To a designer, the guiding principles in the brief are actually important decisions made without the benefit of critical thinking or new ideas. The designer—and therefore the innovation that comes from design—is effectively cut out of the process. In essence, the guidelines become the decision.

A design-minded leader might have framed the brief differently, perhaps as series of questions:

1) What is the future of universities in the light of advancing technology?

2) Where will the power shift to—toward universities, students, instructors, or entirely new education models?

3) How can we take a leading role in the future, given our reputation and assets?

4) What steps should we take now to reach our future state?

By asking questions like these, design thinkers broaden the scope for innovation. They avoid imposing an ideological straitjacket on the innovation process.

From a designer’s standpoint, Porter’s advice looks like a first guess based on a belief system. A design team certainly might have proposed one or more ideas like HBX, but only as possibilities. It would have prototyped other possibilities, too, rejecting some and refining others, until the risk was brought to an acceptable level. Jumping to big conclusions is bad design, and so is jumping to small ones just to avoid risk. Designers have to develop a strong disbelief system.

Porter’s argument for building an integrated brand is that copycats would have to recreate the whole brand to compete with Harvard’s online program. “Any competitor wishing to imitate a strategy,” he says, “must replicate a whole system.” Yet copycats are rarely the biggest threat to leading brands. The real threat is more likely to come from purpose-built organizations, unencumbered by legacy beliefs, that correctly imagine the future of education. They wouldn’t bother replicating Harvard’s system. They would render it irrelevant.

This is where Christensen is strong. He knows that education is ripe for disruption, saying that “half of the United States’ universities could face bankruptcy in 15 years.” Necessarily, his approach is opposed to Porter’s.

Christensen would set up the program as an independent business unit, allowing it to learn from experience without the need for immediate profits or slavish brand alignment. The management team would experiment quickly and cheaply, gathering knowledge about what works and what doesn’t. With success, the new unit could be folded into the legacy brand, or even the other way around, as when Apple became the Macintosh brand, then the iPod brand, and later the iPhone brand.

He sees innovation as something that unfolds over time on the public stage: You put out a cheap product that serves an unmet need, get some traction with it, improve it, begin to raise the price, and meanwhile start looking for your next disruptive innovation. It’s a Darwinian, way-of-the-world model of competition. What it doesn’t acknowledge is the potential of design to speed up this evolution, all the while keeping hard-won learning—and embarassing mistakes—out of the public eye. Design can create disruptive innovation much faster and much more surely than a thousand monkeys with a thousand dry-erase markers. And it shouldn’t take a thousand years, or even a thousand days, with a talented team.

Okay, so how would a design team view Harvard’s challenge? First, it would reframe the brief. It would ask bigger questions, such as:

  • Where does the future of education look like?
  • What value will elite schools provide?
  • What will happen to professors when learning moves online?
  • How will the playing field change when certain professors become superstars?
  • What new pricing models should we consider?
  • How should a student’s education progress?
  • Which courses will be made obsolete by technology?
  • Which new courses are likely to emerge?
  • Should subjects determine learning, or should learning determine subjects?
  • In the future, what will it mean to “go” to school?

Then the designers would imagine a wide variety of futures. Based on these, they would knock together prototypes that posited a range of leaderhship roles for Harvard. The prototypes would be shared, discussed, analyzed, rated, improved, and tested. New prototypes would emerge. Finally, the ideas would resolve into a clear path forward for Harvard. Most of the guessing would occur in private, and most of the success would occur in public. Thus the Harvard brand would be shielded from unnecessary risk. Its value would increase in proportion to the confidence of its moves.

Certainly, guesswork is a key component of innovation. Even the case-study method relies on informed guesses. But for those who want control over the process, the guesses should be informed by design—not driven by beliefs, limited by fears, or lifted wholesale from stories or studies.

This does not lessen the valued contributions of Porter and Christensen. Both professors are lighthouse figures in the world of business strategy. The Times simply used them to illuminate an irony—that the leading school for business strategy can’t agree on its own strategy. But there’s a bigger point. Their shining contributions lead straight to the need for design, not just in products and services, but in business models, organizational culture, and, yes, strategy.

Clayton Christensen


Don't miss ...


<a href="/latest_stories/all/all/30" rel="author">Forbes</a>
Forbes is among the most trusted resources for the world's business and investment leaders, providing them the uncompromising commentary, concise analysis, relevant tools and real-time reporting they need to succeed at work, profit from investing and have fun with the rewards of winning.


blog comments powered by Disqus

Latest stories

Know how to eliminate wine spoiling bacteria?
New York, Aug 31 (IANS) Wine makers have reasons to cheer as researchers have discovered a system that prevents "stuck fermentation" - a chronic problem that spoils wine.
Early Arctic inhabitants lived without sex, says study
London, Aug 31 (IANS) As the scientific community dwells over the possibility that Neanderthals had sex with humans, an Indian-origin researcher has found that the earliest Arctic inhabitants lived in complete sexual isolation from their neighbours for almost 4,000 years.
For DINK couples, outsourcing parenthood is cool
New York, Aug 31 (IANS) For double-income-no-kid (DINK) couples, raising a child is the most difficult part. For them, creches and day-care centres in the marketplace are no less than playing the role of real parents.
Ancient metal workers were not treated as slaves
London, Aug 31 (IANS) Ancient metal workers were highly regarded for their skills and were not treated as slaves as popular narratives suggest, says a study.

Latest from the Network

It's splitsville for Stuart MacGill and wife Friend
Sydney, Aug 31 (IANS) Former Australian cricketer Stuart MacGill has ended his 14-year-old marriage with actor Rachel Friend and the couple reportedly have put their four-bedroom Neutral Bay home here up for sale. "We...
Read more on Sport Balla
Know how to eliminate wine spoiling bacteria?
New York, Aug 31 (IANS) Wine makers have reasons to cheer as researchers have discovered a system that prevents "stuck fermentation" - a chronic problem that spoils wine. Working with a prion - an abnormally shaped...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
US sanctions violate Geneva nuclear deal: Iran
Tehran, Aug 31 (IANS) Iran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif Sunday said the new sanctions imposed by Washington on Tehran in some cases violate the agreement reached last year between the Islamic republic and...
Read more on Politics Balla
Google Glass app that reads emotions, also reveals age
New York, Aug 31 (IANS) What if an app can reveal what the person you are in a conversation with is thinking? This Google Glass - a soon to be launched smart eye-wear - app not only does that for you but can also tell...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
Clashes continue in Libyan capital
Tripoli, Aug 31 (IANS) Fierce clashes continued Sunday in Libya's capital Tripoli as Islamist fighters launched assaults on local militiamen. Heavy exchange of artillery and rocket-propelled grenades were seen on the...
Read more on Politics Balla
After busy day in Kyoto, Modi heads to Tokyo (Roundup)
Kyoto/Tokyo, Aug 31 (IANS) Prime Minister Narendra Modi flew to Tokyo Sunday evening after a busy day in the former Japanese capital Kyoto where he visited two ancient Buddhist temples and sought Japan's help to combat...
Read more on Politics Balla
New map to locate missing flight MH370
Sydney, Aug 31 (IANS) The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) has unveiled a new map to locate the missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370, the Sydney Morning Herald reported Sunday. Flight MH370 disappeared...
Read more on Politics Balla
Lovato praises Knowles, Lopez for redefining beauty
Los Angeles, Aug 31 (IANS) Singer Demi Lovato applauds fellow musicians like Beyoncé Knowles and Jennifer Lopez for making "realistic and achievable" figure in vogue. The 22-year-old recently posted an image on...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
Keira Knightley in music snub
Keira Knightley doesn't listen to music. The 29-year-old actress portrays singer/songwriter Gretta in her latest movie 'Begin Again', but insists she isn't interested in songs at all and was keen to play the character...
Read more on Celebrity Balla
Simon Cowell would definitely 'like another child'
Simon Cowell definitely wants another child. The media mogul - whose partner Lauren Silverman gave birth to their first son Eric in February - has confirmed he wants their family to grow, and even said he's ''thought...
Read more on Celebrity Balla