1 Updates
Galaxy Beam-competitor iPhone Patented by Apple
Photo Credit: Today's iPhone

Apple Patents Projector iPhone, Could Become a Future iGadget

Jul 18 2013, 9:54am CDT | by

Apple could produce a Samsung Galaxy Beam competitor in the days to come

 Apple is known for its multitude of patents that are filed every week. Regardless of the time or occasion, you can always count on Apple to work with the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)...

Filed under: news

Full Story below YouTube Videos

 
 

 

40 weeks ago

Apple Patents Projector iPhone, Could Become a Future iGadget

Jul 18 2013, 9:54am CDT | by

Apple could produce a Samsung Galaxy Beam competitor in the days to come

 

Apple is known for its multitude of patents that are filed every week. Regardless of the time or occasion, you can always count on Apple to work with the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in order to protect its own intellectual property. The company even went to court against Samsung a year or so ago to ensure that its iPhone design and icon layout would be defended against what Apple believed to be “blatant plagiarism” on the part of its greatest, Android archrival. 

 

The reason why Apple has become so patent-centric in recent days pertains to past experiences that Steve Jobs had with a company called “Creative.” When the first iPod emerged from under the Apple brand in 2001, Apple believed its product would be protected because it was the most unique MP3-like music player on the market. 

 

What Apple and Steve Jobs did not expect, however, was to discover that the company would soon become part of a $100 million lawsuit. Apparently, Creative filed a patent for a similar device prior to Apple’s product creation; Creative later sued Apple and won its lawsuit without a fight. At that point, Steve Jobs decided to patent every single idea and thought he had as soon as possible. The result of this desire to protect its intellectual property explains why Apple, since Jobs’s death, has become such a patent-crazy company. 

 

Along these lines, Apple was recently granted a patent with the Patent and Trademark Office that would create a projector iPhone of sorts. This patent pertains to the iconic iPhone we all know and love, but adds a projector for not only the iPhone, but also the iPad and MacBook. The result of this projector would be that one would not need a computer if he or she wanted to watch a movie with a class of students, a group of fellow colleagues, or even give some powerpoint presentations. 

 

While the projector iDevices would work for any setting, Apple seems to be more focused on business settings with the concept, as indicated by the patent description

 

“In one embodiment, electronic devices each may include a projector that produces a projected display and a camera that detects gestures made with respect to the projected displays. The electronic devices may interpret gestures on the projected displays to identify image sharing commands for sharing images between the projected displays…within the shared workspace.”

 

To be brief, the patent calls for the projection of images on displays as well as the ability to share pictures between displays. 

 

Cam Bunton of Today’s iPhone does not seem too excited about Apple’s latest idea, however. In his response to the patent, he says that the concept of a projector iPhone would 1) make the iPhone too big and 2) would be an added feature to the iPhone that consumers would hardly use: 

 

“But given the choice, wouldn’t anyone rather use a large, widescreen HDTV than project a small, low quality image on to a wall? Secondly: Presuming it’s built into an iPhone, it’s going to make that phone so much thicker than is reasonably practicable. Not only does it need to have room enough for the projection lens and light source, but also, the extra battery power required to make it last long enough without dying. And what if the inevitable happens and the projection light starts to fade as all projectors do? Could Apple make it easy to replace? iPhones have never even allowed users to swap batteries out, let alone lights for pico projectors…you’re left with a feature that you barely use and a phone that’s so fat you’d rather leave it on your tablet at home than carry it around.” 

 

Bunton makes some good observations, but there are some problems with his response. First, some individuals do not want to purchase HDTVs because they are not all that mobile. In fact, most individuals have regular televisions today and do not want to pay the price that an HDTV would require. This may vary depending on where you are, but most average consumers could care less about whether or not a television has HD resolution or not. They simply want a television that works and plays the television shows that matter to them. 

 

Next, what about the battery? Bunton believes that Apple would have to create a larger battery to handle the power that the projector would zap from it. That’s true; at the same time, however, isn’t this the price we pay for innovation? 

 

I imagine that, when smartphones were first created and sold, many individuals believed that Internet capabilities were more harmful to a smartphone than helpful; after all, wouldn’t they require the use of antivirus software, as opposed to feature phones, which, for the most part, didn’t have Internet? What would happen to your smartphone if it got infected with a virus? Wouldn’t feature phones be the better, safer phone of choice? 

 

And what about the time when cameras were first added to smartphones? Do you not think that there were individuals who didn’t want them added because they believed their HD cameras that they wore around their necks (or kept in their pockets) were better than the capabilities of a smartphone camera?

 

This argument still prevails today among many, but Samsung responded to this by producing a 10X zoom Galaxy S4 Zoom – a smartphone with a camera that is comparable to many standalone cameras today on the market. 

 

And what about the idea that the pico projector shouldn’t be implemented into the iPhone because consumers will not use it regularly? The same thing could be said for lots of features in the iPhone. Take the camera, for example: The camera is a nice feature to the iPhone, but many consumers only use it to take photos at family and special occasions. 

 

Does this mean, then, that the camera should never have been added to the iPhone? What about the various settings within the iPhone software: should those have never been added because the majority of consumers don’t use them? 

 

The moment you start to toss out an idea because “consumers don’t use it,” you start to toss innovation. Innovation does not work in the idea of “if they don’t use it, don’t implement it”; rather, innovation says, “implement it and they will use it.” 

 

For Apple to implement pico projectors would provide business professionals and ordinary consumers the right to use the iPhone projector at their disposal. What’s wrong with increased customization and an enhanced iPhone experience? 

 

To Apple, I would say this: implement it, and they [consumers] will use it. I can attest to this from personal experience: I never used cameras much until I purchased the iPhone 4S. Now, with my iPhone 5 camera, I snap photos all the time.

 

 

Don't miss ...

 

<a href="/latest_stories/all/all/22" rel="author">Deidre Richardson</a>
Deidre Richardson is a long-time Apple fan and reports passionate about the latest Apple news and rumors.

 

blog comments powered by Disqus

Latest stories

Microsoft Results Beat Estimates, Cheer Investors
The bad news for Microsoft in its fiscal-third quarter was that sales and earnings were both off from a year ago. But the company beat Wall Street estimates and showed surprising strength in its Windows business. Shares...
 
 
Google, Apple settle high-tech workers' lawsuit
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Google, Apple, Intel and Adobe Systems have settled a class-action lawsuit alleging they conspired to prevent their engineers and other highly sought technology workers from getting better job...
 
 
GameStop Dramatically Rolling Back Games Business
“Game” may be right there in the name, but brick and mortar video game store GameStop is looking to diversify. CEO Paul Raines told investors that the company plans on making an aggressive expansion into “gaming...
 
 
Apple: Rotting From The Core?
Apple released results on April 23: The company announced higher dividends, increasing stock buybacks from $60 billion to $90 billion, a 7 for 1 stock split, and higher earnings. The stock shot upward by $44 per share...
 
 
 

Latest from the Network

Google, Apple settle high-tech workers' lawsuit
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Google, Apple, Intel and Adobe Systems have settled a class-action lawsuit alleging they conspired to prevent their engineers and other highly sought technology workers from getting better job...
Read more on Business Balla
 
Microsoft Results Beat Estimates, Cheer Investors
The bad news for Microsoft in its fiscal-third quarter was that sales and earnings were both off from a year ago. But the company beat Wall Street estimates and showed surprising strength in its Windows business. Shares...
Read more on Apple Balla
 
Google, Apple settle high-tech workers' lawsuit
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Google, Apple, Intel and Adobe Systems have settled a class-action lawsuit alleging they conspired to prevent their engineers and other highly sought technology workers from getting better job...
Read more on Apple Balla
 
Oregon moves to dump health exchange website
PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — Oregon, once expected to be a national leader in the federal health care overhaul, on Thursday moved to become the first state to dump its troubled online health exchange and use the federal...
Read more on Business Balla
 
Cloud strength helps Microsoft earnings top Street
LOS ANGELES (AP) — In Satya Nadella's first quarterly earnings release as chief executive, Microsoft Corp. on Thursday posted earnings and revenue that beat Wall Street expectations, offering new justification for the...
Read more on Business Balla
 
Aaron Carter wants to 'sweep' Hilary Duff off feet
Aaron Carter wants to "sweep" Hilary Duff "off her feet". The former pop star dated the 26-year-old singer-and-actress for 18 months when they were teenagers, but he now wants the chance to rekindle their romance....
Read more on Celebrity Balla
 
Amazon Shares Rise As Sales Growth Remains Strong
A big question for shareholders of Amazon.com was the strength of its sales growth for the first quarter. The answer today was sales growth is still darn strong, and shares were higher after hours. Amazon.com said it...
Read more on Business Balla
 
Visa Shares Falling On Light Revenue Despite 26% Jump In Second Quarter Profit
Visa, the world’s largest credit and debit card company, reported a 26% jump in second quarter fiscal 2014 profit Thursday afternoon, but shares of the payment technology company are down in after-hours trading thanks...
Read more on Business Balla
 
Do The FDA's Proposed E-Cigarette Restrictions Go Far Enough?
Today the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) finally announced proposed regulations for e-cigarettes, responding to pressure from public health advocates. The popular battery-powered vaporizing devices have come under...
Read more on Business Balla
 
Africa's Richest Woman Plans To Increase Stake in Unitel
Africa’s richest woman, Isabel dos Santos, plans to increase her stake in Unitel, Angola’s largest mobile phone company. According to a report by Portuguese newspaper, Publico, dos Santos (who already owns 25% of Unitel...
Read more on Business Balla
 
 
Auto Balla Sexy Balla Sport Balla TV Balla Politics Balla Movie Balla Apple Balla Business Balla Ad Balla Celebrity Balla